SRE & Reliability Uplift
Reliability practices that hold up at scale-up pace, without the FAANG-style overhead.
Investment
$25–35k
AUD ex GST
Duration
6–8 weeks
Delivery
Remote-first
Who this is for
Engineering teams whose product has outgrown best-effort reliability — customers depend on it now, but the on-call rotation is informal, incidents take longer than they should to resolve, and there’s no shared definition of “good enough” uptime.
The problem
SRE practice as written assumes Google-sized teams and Google-sized incident volume. Most scale-ups can’t run it as documented and shouldn’t try. What they can do is take the parts that compound — service-level objectives tied to customer experience, a real incident response practice, and a culture of blameless post-incident review — and build them into how the team already works.
What you get
- Service-level objective (SLO) definitions tied to the user journeys that matter most
- Error budget policy — how the team responds when budget is burning, how it’s reviewed
- Incident response practice — severity definitions, command structure, comms templates, rotation design
- Post-incident review template and facilitation guide that the team will actually use
- Observability and alerting baseline — what’s missing, what’s noise, what to invest in
- Reliability roadmap for the next 12 months with effort estimates and sequencing
How it works
| 6–8 weeks | |
|---|---|
| Weeks 1–2 | discovery, current-state of monitoring, on-call, and incident history |
| Weeks 3–5 | SLO design, error budget policy, incident response practice |
| Weeks 6–8 | rollout, first post-incident review, handover |
Scope and duration depend on the number of services in scope and whether existing observability tooling is fit for purpose.
Ready to talk?
A 30-minute discovery call is enough to scope the engagement and confirm it's the right fit.