The Metacosm logo, a stylized graphic representing collaboration and teamwork.
← All services Tech Program 5

SRE & Reliability Uplift

Reliability practices that hold up at scale-up pace, without the FAANG-style overhead.

Investment

$25–35k

AUD ex GST

Duration

6–8 weeks

Delivery

Remote-first

Who this is for

Engineering teams whose product has outgrown best-effort reliability — customers depend on it now, but the on-call rotation is informal, incidents take longer than they should to resolve, and there’s no shared definition of “good enough” uptime.

The problem

SRE practice as written assumes Google-sized teams and Google-sized incident volume. Most scale-ups can’t run it as documented and shouldn’t try. What they can do is take the parts that compound — service-level objectives tied to customer experience, a real incident response practice, and a culture of blameless post-incident review — and build them into how the team already works.

What you get

  • Service-level objective (SLO) definitions tied to the user journeys that matter most
  • Error budget policy — how the team responds when budget is burning, how it’s reviewed
  • Incident response practice — severity definitions, command structure, comms templates, rotation design
  • Post-incident review template and facilitation guide that the team will actually use
  • Observability and alerting baseline — what’s missing, what’s noise, what to invest in
  • Reliability roadmap for the next 12 months with effort estimates and sequencing

How it works

6–8 weeks
Weeks 1–2discovery, current-state of monitoring, on-call, and incident history
Weeks 3–5SLO design, error budget policy, incident response practice
Weeks 6–8rollout, first post-incident review, handover

Scope and duration depend on the number of services in scope and whether existing observability tooling is fit for purpose.

Ready to talk?

A 30-minute discovery call is enough to scope the engagement and confirm it's the right fit.